Short answer: Autify is the right choice when recording a flow by clicking through it is the natural way for your team to work, and you need mobile coverage. Testmode is the right choice when describing the test is faster than performing it.

Neither tool asks you to write code. The difference is where a test comes from: Autify starts from a recorded session, Testmode starts from a sentence.

At a glance

	Autify	Testmode
How a test is created	Record a session in the browser, then edit steps	Write what to test in plain English
Test representation	A sequence of recorded steps	A described outcome
Maintenance when UI changes	AI self-healing on recorded locators	AI re-interprets the described intent
Scope	Web and native mobile	Web applications
Requires access to the running app first	Yes, to record	Only to run
Cost model	Commercial product	Commercial product

Where Autify is the better tool

You need native mobile testing. Autify covers native apps. Testmode tests web applications. If mobile is a requirement, this is decisive.
Recording genuinely suits your team. For long, fiddly flows with many form fields, clicking through once is often faster than describing every field.
You want to see the exact steps. A recorded test is explicit. Every step is visible and editable, which some teams strongly prefer for auditability.
Your flows depend on precise interactions. Drag-and-drop, canvas work and pixel-level interactions are easier to demonstrate than to describe.

Where Testmode fits better

You can describe the test before the feature exists. A recording needs a working application to record against. A sentence does not, so tests can be written alongside the requirement.
Recording does not capture intent. A recorded session knows that someone clicked a particular button. It does not know why, or what the outcome was supposed to be. When the flow changes, a recording has to be re-recorded; a description of the intended outcome often still holds.
Nobody wants to re-record after a redesign. Self-healing extends the life of a recorded test, but it is still repairing a path through an interface that may no longer exist.
The test should be readable by people who did not write it. A sentence is reviewable by a stakeholder. A step list is not really.

The honest summary

Autify wins on mobile coverage and on flows that are genuinely easier to perform than to explain.

Testmode wins when the test is a statement about what the software should do rather than a record of what someone once did. If your team keeps re-recording tests after every release, that is the loop Testmode is built to break.

Before you choose, check what Testmode can and cannot test. Still comparing? Autify alternatives covers the wider field. Or see every comparison.