Back to Testmode

Comparison

Testmode vs Autify

Autify is a no-code testing platform built around recording steps in the browser. Testmode is an AI tester you describe a test to. Here is how they differ and when each one is the right choice.

Short answer: Autify is the right choice when recording a flow by clicking through it is the natural way for your team to work, and you need mobile coverage. Testmode is the right choice when describing the test is faster than performing it.

Neither tool asks you to write code. The difference is where a test comes from: Autify starts from a recorded session, Testmode starts from a sentence.

At a glance

Autify Testmode
How a test is created Record a session in the browser, then edit steps Write what to test in plain English
Test representation A sequence of recorded steps A described outcome
Maintenance when UI changes AI self-healing on recorded locators AI re-interprets the described intent
Scope Web and native mobile Web applications
Requires access to the running app first Yes, to record Only to run
Cost model Commercial product Commercial product

Where Autify is the better tool

  • You need native mobile testing. Autify covers native apps. Testmode tests web applications. If mobile is a requirement, this is decisive.
  • Recording genuinely suits your team. For long, fiddly flows with many form fields, clicking through once is often faster than describing every field.
  • You want to see the exact steps. A recorded test is explicit. Every step is visible and editable, which some teams strongly prefer for auditability.
  • Your flows depend on precise interactions. Drag-and-drop, canvas work and pixel-level interactions are easier to demonstrate than to describe.

Where Testmode fits better

  • You can describe the test before the feature exists. A recording needs a working application to record against. A sentence does not, so tests can be written alongside the requirement.
  • Recording does not capture intent. A recorded session knows that someone clicked a particular button. It does not know why, or what the outcome was supposed to be. When the flow changes, a recording has to be re-recorded; a description of the intended outcome often still holds.
  • Nobody wants to re-record after a redesign. Self-healing extends the life of a recorded test, but it is still repairing a path through an interface that may no longer exist.
  • The test should be readable by people who did not write it. A sentence is reviewable by a stakeholder. A step list is not really.

The honest summary

Autify wins on mobile coverage and on flows that are genuinely easier to perform than to explain.

Testmode wins when the test is a statement about what the software should do rather than a record of what someone once did. If your team keeps re-recording tests after every release, that is the loop Testmode is built to break.